Friday 28 February 2014

TRADERS SHOULD BE AWARE

1. Stock prices run in cycles. Periods of re-pricing are usually quick and powerful and then they are followed by trendless consolidation.
2. Stocks are very highly correlated during drastic selloffs and during the initial stage of the recovery. In general, correlation is high during bear markets.
3. Bull markets are markets of stocks, where there are both winners and losers. When the market averages consolidate, there are stocks that will break out or down, revealing the intentions of institutional buyers.
4. In the first and last stage of a new bull market, the best performers are small cap, low float, low-priced stocks.
5. Try to trade in the direction of the trend. It is not only the path of least resistance, but also provides the best profit opportunities. Have a simple method to define the direction of the trend.
6. Traders’ attention (and market volume) is attracted by unusual price moves. Sudden price range expansion from a consolidaiton is often the beginning of a powerful new trend.
7. Opportunity cost matters a lot. Be in stocks that move. Stocks in a range are dead money.
8. Big winners are obvious only in hindsight. Many other stocks shared the same characteristics when they tried to break out. Some failed. Some had a followthrough. Being wrong is not a choice. Staying wrong is. You can only control your risk and how long you will ride your winners.
9. The overall market conditions will never be perfect and when they seem so, it is probably a good idea to decrease exposure and take profits. With that in mind, you don’t have to be in the market all the time. When you don’t see good setups, it just makes sense to watch from the sidelines.
10. Big institutions achieve outsized returns by riding strong trends for the long-term (long enough to make a difference). This is the only way for them. They can’t easily and often get in and out due to their size. Establishing small positions does not make sense for them as it would not make a difference for the bottom line. Big winners can make a difference when they are big positions. Big positions take time to accumulate and along the way institutions leave clear traces.
11. Small losses are often better than small gains. If I sell my position every time it shows me a small gain, I would never achieve a return high enough to make a difference and to cover the inevitable losses. Amateurs go bankrupt by not taking small losses. Professionals go bankrupt by taking small gains. It is absolutely true that a large number of consecutive gains could multiply returns substantially. The point is how big should be those gains. 4-5% is not going to help a lot. 15-20%  gains is something completely different.
12. Optimism and pessimism in the stock market are contagious. Investors psychology often loses its logic and become emotional. The news media and the most recent price action play a particularly important role in developing moods of mass optimism or pessimism.

VIEWS ON RELIANCE

 Today it kissed 799 in Future
Three Consecutive close below 797 level if happens then ??
We see NONSTOP PANIC upto 763 -752 level 
Below 822 level ,Bears will have UPPERHAND -No if and But.
In this stock or any stock there are no Bulls or Bears (In India CC people +Mutual Funds +Fii’s decide the trend of stock and Market )
Reliance was -is and will remain BHISAMPITAMA of Indian Stock Market.
LION HEART CLIENTSTraders ,Can Buy keeping a stop of 755-760 ……………………..Risk of Rs.40 from this level.
If Mr.M wins and becomes PM then stock can flare to 900-950-1000 by May or June end ??
If stock is not moving up …………….(something big is cooking )

Thursday 27 February 2014

LEVELS FOR 28-2-2014

   Market Review for 28th February 2014     

Nifty (6239) we said ‘technically trade long as long as 6175 holds” the market traded above our crucial support and closed right on our resistance like a dot…technically 6175 still is a crucial support to work…  

The support for Nifty is it 6175-6100 and the resistance to the up move at 6287-6310

INFLATION VERSUS GROWTH DEBATE

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Raghuram Rajan today waded into the inflation versus growth debate once again — and asserted that “the best way for the central bank to generate growth in the long run is for it to bring down inflation”.
The issue threatens to snowball into another major standoff between the finance ministry and the RBI over the conduct of monetary policy, especially after the finance minister has insisted that the central bank must strike a balance between the compulsions of arresting inflation and the exigency of kick-starting a faltering economy.
“The RBI is committed to getting the strongest growth possible for India – there is no difference between us and North Block on this. We believe the best way we can foster sustainable growth in the current situation… is through monetary stability — by bringing down inflation over a reasonable period of time. More specifically, we intend to bring consumer price index (CPI) inflation down to 8 per cent by January 2015 and 6 per cent by January 2016,” Rajan said while inaugurating the annual conference of the Fixed Income Money market and Derivatives Association of India and Primary Dealers Association of India.
The conduct of monetary policy has itself become a subject of debate with the Justice B.N. Srikrishna, who headed the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission, coming out with a report in March last year that recommended that the Centre should set a “quantitative monitorable objective” for the central bank while setting out its monetary policy function. The FSLRC had also said that a seven–member monetary policy committee should be established and inflation need not be its sole objective.
“If, in the future, the government felt that the appropriate goal of monetary policy was a fixed exchange rate, or nominal GDP, then it would be able to specify these goals,” the Justice Srikrishna report had said.
Last month, a committee set up by the RBI under deputy governor Urjit Patel came out with its report on the framework for the conduct of monetary policy that sharply differed with the FSLRC report. The Patel report said the RBI should focus on reining in CPI inflation and suggested a “glide path” to bring it down to 6 per cent — a suggestion that Rajan has enthusiastically embraced.
On Wednesday, Rajan said it would be “good for the medium term inflation target to be set by the executive or the legislature, presumably based on advice from the Reserve Bank.”
While rubbishing the notion that the policymakers on Mint Street had turned into a bunch of “inflation nutters”, Rajan had a forthright suggestion for the finance ministry. “International experience suggests that… once the central bank’s objective is given, and the operational target fixed, the government should leave the technocrats in the central bank to do their job,” he said.
Rajan has raised interest rates three times since he assumed office on September 4 last year, sparking alarm in both government corridors and company boardrooms at a time the Indian economy is bracing for another dog year with GDP growth forecast at around 5 per cent.
Last month, the RBI governor had raised the policy rate by 25 basis points to 8 per cent to beat down on retail inflation that is riding at just under 10 per cent.
Rajan said the Urjit Patel committee’s suggestion to bring down retail inflation to 6 per cent by 2016 was “doable without extreme hardship”.
The simmering tension between the finance ministry and the RBI over the recent increases will only escalate as the general elections draw near and the government’s report card comes under intense scrutiny.
In fact, the Srikrishna report had also recognised the pressures that the central bank would face in such a situation. It had said, “If a central bank lacks independence, it comes under pressure to cut rates in the period preceding elections. This tends to kick off increased inflation after elections. The lack of independence at a central bank is thus associated with reduced fairness in elections and enhanced macroeconomic fluctuations.”
Rajan also took a sharp dig at industrialists who have been clamouring for rate cuts.
“I have yet to meet an industrialist who does not want lower rates, whatever the level of rates. But will a lower policy interest rate today give him more incentive to invest? We at the RBI think not. First, we don’t believe the primary factor holding back investments today is high interest rates. Second, even if we cut rates, we don’t believe banks, which are paying higher deposit rates, will cut their lending rates. The reason is that the depositor, given her high inflationary expectations, will not settle for less than the rates banks are paying her. Inflation is placing a floor on deposit rates, and thus on lending rates,” he added.

CURB INFLATION FOR REVIVING GROWTH

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Raghuram Rajan today waded into the inflation versus growth debate once again — and asserted that “the best way for the central bank to generate growth in the long run is for it to bring down inflation”.
The issue threatens to snowball into another major standoff between the finance ministry and the RBI over the conduct of monetary policy, especially after the finance minister has insisted that the central bank must strike a balance between the compulsions of arresting inflation and the exigency of kick-starting a faltering economy.
“The RBI is committed to getting the strongest growth possible for India – there is no difference between us and North Block on this. We believe the best way we can foster sustainable growth in the current situation… is through monetary stability — by bringing down inflation over a reasonable period of time. More specifically, we intend to bring consumer price index (CPI) inflation down to 8 per cent by January 2015 and 6 per cent by January 2016,” Rajan said while inaugurating the annual conference of the Fixed Income Money market and Derivatives Association of India and Primary Dealers Association of India.
The conduct of monetary policy has itself become a subject of debate with the Justice B.N. Srikrishna, who headed the Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission, coming out with a report in March last year that recommended that the Centre should set a “quantitative monitorable objective” for the central bank while setting out its monetary policy function. The FSLRC had also said that a seven–member monetary policy committee should be established and inflation need not be its sole objective.
“If, in the future, the government felt that the appropriate goal of monetary policy was a fixed exchange rate, or nominal GDP, then it would be able to specify these goals,” the Justice Srikrishna report had said.
Last month, a committee set up by the RBI under deputy governor Urjit Patel came out with its report on the framework for the conduct of monetary policy that sharply differed with the FSLRC report. The Patel report said the RBI should focus on reining in CPI inflation and suggested a “glide path” to bring it down to 6 per cent — a suggestion that Rajan has enthusiastically embraced.
On Wednesday, Rajan said it would be “good for the medium term inflation target to be set by the executive or the legislature, presumably based on advice from the Reserve Bank.”
While rubbishing the notion that the policymakers on Mint Street had turned into a bunch of “inflation nutters”, Rajan had a forthright suggestion for the finance ministry. “International experience suggests that… once the central bank’s objective is given, and the operational target fixed, the government should leave the technocrats in the central bank to do their job,” he said.
Rajan has raised interest rates three times since he assumed office on September 4 last year, sparking alarm in both government corridors and company boardrooms at a time the Indian economy is bracing for another dog year with GDP growth forecast at around 5 per cent.
Last month, the RBI governor had raised the policy rate by 25 basis points to 8 per cent to beat down on retail inflation that is riding at just under 10 per cent.
Rajan said the Urjit Patel committee’s suggestion to bring down retail inflation to 6 per cent by 2016 was “doable without extreme hardship”.
The simmering tension between the finance ministry and the RBI over the recent increases will only escalate as the general elections draw near and the government’s report card comes under intense scrutiny.
In fact, the Srikrishna report had also recognised the pressures that the central bank would face in such a situation. It had said, “If a central bank lacks independence, it comes under pressure to cut rates in the period preceding elections. This tends to kick off increased inflation after elections. The lack of independence at a central bank is thus associated with reduced fairness in elections and enhanced macroeconomic fluctuations.”
Rajan also took a sharp dig at industrialists who have been clamouring for rate cuts.
“I have yet to meet an industrialist who does not want lower rates, whatever the level of rates. But will a lower policy interest rate today give him more incentive to invest? We at the RBI think not. First, we don’t believe the primary factor holding back investments today is high interest rates. Second, even if we cut rates, we don’t believe banks, which are paying higher deposit rates, will cut their lending rates. The reason is that the depositor, given her high inflationary expectations, will not settle for less than the rates banks are paying her. Inflation is placing a floor on deposit rates, and thus on lending rates,” he added.

INDIA NEEDS INFRASTRUCTURE

Expressing concern over decline in infrastructure investment, HDFC Chairman Deepak Parekh today said infrastructure investment has derailed in the past two years and revitalising investment in the sector will be a big task for the new government.
At India Economic Convention organised by India Foundation, Deepak Parekh said the country needs USD 1 trillion in the 12th Plan of which 47 per cent was to come from private sector, but it has not happened in the first two years of the Plan period.
Concerned over surging NPAs in banks, the banker said “as we speak, 11 banks have NPAs of over 5 per cent”. In absolute terms to be about 4 lakh crore of which about would be required to be “written off”. Majority of this NPA comes from infrastructure sector, he added.
To deal with such situation, banks need more capital. But banks, he said, has “inherent problem” in raising equity as government’s capital infusion is “inadequate”.
For current fiscal govt infused Rs 14,000 crore in PSU banks and has earmarked Rs 11,200 crore for next.
Deepak Parekh stressed on deepening of equity markets to deal with the problem.
Listing out a 10 point agenda for the new government, he said India needs to privatise coal sector to reduce dependence on imported coal, which is a huge drain on exchequer.
He stressed on inter-ministerial coordination so that they do not work in silos.
The banker advocated corporatisation of railways, improving existing urban infrastructure in addition to development of new cities and FDI in different spheres of economy.
Deepak Parekh further said politicians need to back bureaucrats in policy making to boost their moral and confidence.
Lamenting that India fares poor on ease of doing business in global list, he said the next government should work towards improving this.
There is also need for clear and transparent policy for furthering business confidence, he added.

Tuesday 25 February 2014

NIFTY FUTURE

Last Close : 6209 level.
March Closed at 6249 level. (40 point up )
NF-2602
Above is Daily Chart of Nifty Future
Above 6189 ,Our Target of 6266-6292 is intact !!
(Three Consecutive close above 6189 ,Next Target 6266-6292 )
Today ,Suppose not crosses High of Yesterday : 6223 & trades below 6212 level will take to 6183 level in PANIC.
Now ,SUPPOSE BREAKS 6183 with volumes and stays below for 15-20 minutes ,Next Target :6159-6151 level in hrs only.
7DMEA at 6155 -Very crucial support level.

BELIEVEITORNOT
497 pointsWe see 5450 or 6750-6800 level…………………………………!
Unexpected level in next 13 Weeks (Count from Next Week )
Risk Takers can Buy June 7000 Call at 1.2 (Total Risk Rs.120 only )

TRADERS MIND

anatomy of traders mind

Monday 24 February 2014

BANK NIFTY

Two Consecutive close above 10696 level…………………………Next Target intact :10939-11020 level.
today..
Rally upto  10790————–10821 on card !
Now Once crosses 10821 level with volumes and sustains above for 15-20 minutes then ???

gap-
Will it fill the gap of 10970 level ???
ENJOYEDBLAST
IRB ,PFC ,HDFC ,HDFC BANK ……………………………………..on Fire
AXIS BANK
Above 1223 level………………….if sustains ,We see BLAST upto 1270-1285 level very soon.
7 Days back it was 1084 (Yesterday it was 1242 )…………….Pure Manipulation + Stock Rigging..Only few people in Delhi and Mumbai knows what will happen and when it will happen ?
ICICI-13
Above 1029 level ,Rally can continue upto 1055—–1064 level.
(Remember 945 was major support or last hope ? )
INDUSIND BANK
Hurdle & Target :404————————408.25
Now if crosses 408.25 with volumes and stays above for 20 minutes ,Next Target :421-425 level.
Will Update more to our Subscribers.
SBI LOGO
Watch :1525.25 as Hurdle for this stock.
Now crossover above 1525.25 with volumes……………………….Next Target :1541-1546 level in hrs only

UNITECH- A WILLFUL DEFAULTER

LIC) of India has reported Unitech to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as a wilful defaulter, a senior official at India’s largest life insurance confirmed.
Unitech, India’s fourth largest real estate developer, has defaulted on a Rs 200-crore loan it took from the insurance behemoth in 2007. News regarding the developer’s loan default first came out in December, when it claimed that it had agreed to pay Rs 70-80 crore to LIC.
When contacted by FE, Unitech stated that it stands by the statement it had issued to all stakeholders last week.
“…requisite steps have been taken by the Company to ensure no pendency with the Life Insurance Corporation of India that will be reflected in the financial results and/or financial statements, which are due at the end of this financial year,” Unitech had stated in a notification to the Bombay Stock Exchange on Friday.
Unitech has now joined the list of Indian corporates which have been identified as wilful defaulters by Indian banks due to delays in repaying loans.
One way the RBI defines a wilful default is when the unit has delayed on its repayment obligations even though it has the ability to pay the lenders. A wilful default is also declared when the unit has delayed repayment but has not used the funds for the specified purposes for which the loans were taken. Moreover, if funds have been siphoned off or if the moveable fixed assets or immoveable property underlying the loan have been disposed off by the promoter, without the knowledge of the lenders, it’s considered a wilful default.
In December, the central bank released a set of guidelines to curb the stressed assets in the banking system and outlined the treatment to be meted out to wilful defaulters. These steps would make it more difficult for such defaulters to get additional loans from banks.
Unitech’s income from operations for the quarter ended December 31 stood at Rs 398.98 crore, up 57% from a year earlier. The company’s net profit for the quarter was down 41% from the previous year, at Rs 23.10 crore.

Sunday 23 February 2014

NIFTY FUTURE LEVELS FOR 24-2-2014

Last Close :6163.95
NF-2402
Above is Daily Chart of Nifty Future
101% No need to Change levels :From Last 4 days we are writing………6163 is Hurdle & 6189 will act as LAXMAN REKHA
On Friday Boldly written :Above 6123 level it will zoom to kiss 6151-6155 level is possible.
It made High of 6169 level on Friday.
Just see from last 4 sessions…………….it is kissing 3 & 7 DEMA moving average (But not able to break )
jumper1
Above 6189 level if able to sustain with volumes…………………+ closes above this level 
Next Target :6266—6292 is possible in hrs only.
Gap @ 6266 has to be filled.
Support at 6141 ,7 DEMA  @ 6120 leve

LEVELS FOR 24-2-2014

   Market Review for 24th February 2014     

Nifty (6155) we said ‘now looks like 6050-6000 is within reach’ the market bounced back instead and now if it crosses 6160 then maybe 6200 could be within reach…but the market is still typically sideways mode…                    

The support for Nifty is it 6086-6050 and the resistance to the up move at 6140-6200

Saturday 22 February 2014

WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY ?

23 February 2014 - 12:04 pm
  • A sideways market?
  • A trending market?
  • A trend continuing;
  • A trend reversal?
  • Getting stopped out of a trade?
  • Winning a trade?
  • Breaking even?
  • Losing a trade?
All questions that need to be answered if you are to have confidence in your trading system.  For it is confidence that allows you to profit from the markets.
Ridiculous notion?  Perhaps.  But true nonetheless. 
You see, despite our civilized veneer, we are still animals that react to fear, the most powerful of emotions.  And it is fear that supercedes our thoughts when we trade.
To circumvent fear, you should develop trading plans, trade according to plan, and analyze your trades in a trading journal.  As do this, you will build a database that will create statistical patterns of your trades.  This can be studied and help you to predict the outcome of future trades.
And it is this knowledge that gives you your confidence to spend your valuable time creating trading plans, trading according to plan, and analyzing your results. 
Without this knowledge, we are frightened beasts that depend upon our fear to trade.  And this is disastrous to our bottom line.
So make the choice, trade with fear, or trade with knowledge.

Thursday 20 February 2014

DO NOT BLAME THE FEDERAL RESERVE

Don’t blame the Federal Reserve for the recent selloff in some emerging markets.
That’s the verdict from a new report from the World Bank that examines the outlook for capital flows into developing economies in 2014.
The World Bank’s semi-annual Financial Markets Outlook argues:
Although the turmoil coincided with the further unwinding of the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program, it does not appear to have been caused by it.
The actual decision to continue tapering asset purchases was made on January 29, after the sell-off began and in line with market expectations.
Unlike the sharp selloff in emerging bonds and currencies last May, when the Fed first signalled it would slow its bond-buying programme, yields on ten-year US Treasuries actually fell during this year’s bout of volatility, the report said.
The report’s conclusion comes as G20 finance ministers prepare to gather in Sydney, where the question of the fallout for emerging markets from the Fed’s decision to slow stimulus is expected to be on the agenda.
With the gap in rate growth rates between developed and developed economies expected to narrow this year, the World Bank expects private capital inflows into emerging economies to slow this year.
It forecasts net private capital inflows will slow to $1.065 trillion (4.2 percent of developing country GDP) in 2014 from $1.078 trillion (4.6 percent of GDP) in 2013.
According to the World Bank, those developing economies with a larger reliance on foreign capital – such as India, Turkey and South Africa – were hit harder by the selloff.
Given the selloff that marked the last two weeks of January has abated, the report argues that:
A return to calmer market conditions after the January 2014 unrest offers an opportunity for policy-makers across developing countries to address vulnerabilities and undertake the necessary confidence-building reforms. Policy complacency would eventually lead to larger adjustments down the road, and come at greater economic cost given the closer scrutiny of domestic risks by financial markets.

Wednesday 19 February 2014

TRADING IDEAS FOR 20-2-14

20-Feb-2014
PICK OF THE DAYTARGET 1TARGET 2STOP LOSS
BUY NUCLEUS SOFTWARE AT 186194202183
FUTURES
SELL IBREALEST FUT AT 47.545.54448.50

Tuesday 18 February 2014

RANBAXY & TEVA TO SETTLE ISSUES

Ranbaxy, Teva to Settle with New York Attorney General

19 February 2014 
BREAKING NEWS-FLASHNew York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman plans to announce a settlement Wednesday with U.S. units of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. 500359.BY +1.45% and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. TEVA +3.35% over allegations the two rival generic drug makers made an unlawful agreement to restrict competition.
Mr. Schneiderman’s office confirmed the settlement. As part of the deal, the companies will terminate an agreement not to challenge each other’s rights to sell certain generic drugs exclusively in the U.S. They also agreed to refrain from entering into similar agreements in the future, and will pay the state $300,000.
“Agreements between drug manufacturers to protect each other’s market positions violate fundamental principles of antitrust law and can lead to higher drug prices,” Mr. Schneiderman said in a written statement. He said drug companies “should be aware that my office will intervene aggressively to root out collusion among industry players.”
The companies neither admitted nor denied Mr. Schneiderman’s allegations as part of the settlement.
A Teva spokeswoman declined to comment. Ranbaxy didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The attorney general’s office didn’t identify any “real-world” anticompetitive effects from the companies’ agreement, but said the pact was illegal regardless of whether there were any such effects, according to the settlement.
The settlement resolves Mr. Schneiderman’s investigation of a 2010 agreement between the companies in which Ranbaxy made contingency plans regarding its planned sale of a generic version of the cholesterol drug Lipitor.
Ranbaxy was concerned it might not receive U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in time to begin selling the drug in late 2011, so it reached a financial deal that would have allowed Teva to sell generic Lipitor in the event that it couldn’t, according to the attorney general’s office.
Ranbaxy did end up obtaining FDA approval and began selling the drug. But the agreement with Teva remained in place. The deal allegedly included a provision in which each company agreed not to challenge each other’s exclusivity rights on a range of generic drugs.
When a generic drug maker seeks to bring a new drug to market by challenging the patents on a brand-name drug, it can be eligible to obtain the exclusive right to sell the generic drug for 180 days without competition from other generic pharmaceutical companies. That U.S. regulatory approach is designed to encourage generic drug makers to challenge brand name medicines.
If one generic manufacturer believes a rival shouldn’t have received the 180-day exclusivity, it can file a challenge with the FDA or in court. Mr. Schneiderman said Ranbaxy and Teva agreed to refrain from bringing these types of challenges. He said such agreements can harm consumers because generic drug prices are lower when multiple manufacturers enter the market.
New York officials believe their settlement is the first of its kind to apply a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling to an agreement between two generic drug makers.
The high court decision, from June 2013, focused on agreements between brand-name drug makers and potential generic rivals that could delay competition. The justices ruled that regulators could scrutinize such deals on antitrust grounds.

GROSS NPA OF 40 BANKS

Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of 40 listed banks rose over 35 per cent, or Rs 63,386 crore, during the nine months ended December to cross the Rs 2.4-lakh-crore mark.
Bad assets had grown 27 per cent in the first half of the fiscal.
According to a study by NPAsource.com, 10 out of the 40 listed banks accounted for nearly 70 per cent of the total gross NPAs.
The State Bank of India had the largest share in the total gross NPAs at 28 per cent and Rs 67,799 crore. It was followed by Punjab National Bank with 7 per cent share at Rs 16,596 crore.
The Bank of Baroda and the Central Bank of India have a 5 per cent share each.
The Bank of Maharashtra posted the largest increase in gross NPAs of 209 per cent at Rs 3,516 crore from Rs 1,138 crore as of March 31, 2013. It was followed by the Calcutta-based United Bank of India, which reported a jump of 188 per cent at Rs 8,546 crore at end of the third quarter.
The asset quality of commercial banks has come under pressure because of the economic slowdown.
Bankers and experts point out that the current trend will continue till the economic growth improves.
However, banks are now aggressively focussing on recoveries and upgradations of stressed accounts.
“There is no respite for banks in India from the onslaught of higher interest rates and slowdown in the Indian economy leading to further increase in loans turning bad from corporate as well as retail segments,” D.K. Jain, chairman and managing director of Atishya Group, who owns NPAsource.com, said.
“The fourth quarter of 2013-14 will continue to be bad for banks on the NPA front, but most banks will resort to higher levels of provisioning to bring down their net NPA levels. The first quarter of the next financial year, too, will continue to be bad for banks with regard to NPAs,’’ he added.
Net NPAs of banks during the first nine months of this fiscal rose to 49 per cent from 38 per cent during the first six months of 2013-14.